From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

We context switch LBRs in call stack mode. Currently LBR_INFO
was also context switched, but we normally don't need that
in call stack mode.

Make the context switch check the NO_CYCLES|NO_FLAGS event
flags that were earlier added, and if set avoid writing
the LBR_INFO MSRs unnecessarily.

The same is done for the LBR reset code.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h           |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c     |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 1b47164..4ae66e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -634,6 +634,7 @@ struct x86_perf_task_context {
        int tos;
        int lbr_callstack_users;
        int lbr_stack_state;
+       int need_info;
 };
 
 #define x86_add_quirk(func_)                                           \
@@ -887,7 +888,7 @@ void intel_ds_init(void);
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in);
 
-void intel_pmu_lbr_reset(void);
+void intel_pmu_lbr_reset(bool need_info);
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index f17772a..42f21f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2844,7 +2844,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
        /*
         * Deal with CPUs that don't clear their LBRs on power-up.
         */
-       intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
+       intel_pmu_lbr_reset(1);
 
        cpuc->lbr_sel = NULL;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 60e71b7..7c21efb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -195,27 +195,30 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_32(void)
                wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + i, 0);
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(void)
+static void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(bool need_info)
 {
        int i;
 
        for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
                wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + i, 0);
                wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to   + i, 0);
-               if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
+               if (need_info)
                        wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + i, 0);
        }
 }
 
-void intel_pmu_lbr_reset(void)
+void intel_pmu_lbr_reset(bool need_info)
 {
        if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
                return;
 
+       if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format != LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
+               need_info = false;
+
        if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_32)
                intel_pmu_lbr_reset_32();
        else
-               intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64();
+               intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(need_info);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -242,7 +245,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct 
x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
 
        if (task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users == 0 ||
            task_ctx->lbr_stack_state == LBR_NONE) {
-               intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
+               intel_pmu_lbr_reset(task_ctx->need_info > 0);
                return;
        }
 
@@ -252,7 +255,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(struct 
x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
                lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
                wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_from[i]);
                wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_to[i]);
-               if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
+               if (task_ctx->need_info)
                        wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_info[i]);
        }
        wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
@@ -276,7 +279,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_save(struct 
x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx)
                lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
                rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_from[i]);
                rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_to[i]);
-               if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
+               if (task_ctx->need_info)
                        rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr_info[i]);
        }
        task_ctx->tos = tos;
@@ -317,7 +320,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context 
*ctx, bool sched_in)
         * stack with branch from multiple tasks.
         */
        if (sched_in) {
-               intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
+               intel_pmu_lbr_reset(!task_ctx || task_ctx->need_info > 0);
                cpuc->lbr_context = ctx;
        }
 }
@@ -340,7 +343,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
         * avoid data leaks.
         */
        if (event->ctx->task && cpuc->lbr_context != event->ctx) {
-               intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
+               intel_pmu_lbr_reset(!(event->hw.branch_reg.reg & LBR_NO_INFO));
                cpuc->lbr_context = event->ctx;
        }
        cpuc->br_sel = event->hw.branch_reg.reg;
@@ -349,6 +352,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
                                        event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
                task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
                task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users++;
+               if (!(cpuc->br_sel & LBR_NO_INFO))
+                       task_ctx->need_info++;
        }
 
        cpuc->lbr_users++;
@@ -367,6 +372,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable(struct perf_event *event)
                                        event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
                task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
                task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users--;
+               if (!(cpuc->br_sel & LBR_NO_INFO))
+                       task_ctx->need_info--;
        }
 
        cpuc->lbr_users--;
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to