On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:42:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> > PERF_RECORD_AUXTRACE_ERROR = 72,
> > + PERF_RECORD_THREAD_MAP = 73,
> > PERF_RECORD_HEADER_MAX
> > };
> >
> > @@ -356,6 +357,17 @@ struct context_switch_event {
> > u32 next_prev_tid;
> > };
> >
> > +struct thread_map_data_event {
>
> Humm, I think "data" here is way too vague here, how about
> "thread_map_event_entry"?
>
> Moving of "entry" to the end also helps in understanding that this is
> not an "event" per se, it doesn't have the perv_event_header, etc, its
> just an entry in a 'struct thread_map_event'.
>
> I'm tentatively doing this change in my local branch, please let me know
> if you have any reason to object to such a change,
np, hope there's not much dependency on this later
in patchset ;-) probably not..
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
