On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:57:05PM -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> +static void rseq_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn,
> +                        struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> +     set_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> +}
>  
>  static __read_mostly struct preempt_ops rseq_preempt_ops = {
>       .sched_in = rseq_sched_in_nop,
> -     .sched_out = rseq_sched_out_nop,
> +     .sched_out = rseq_sched_out,
>  };

Since we're unconditionally setting this TIF flag for these tasks, can't
we introduce something similar to the (contested) TIF_NOHZ_FULL thing
which is kept on the task indefinitely.

That avoids having the preempt notifiers and this atomic op in the
schedule path.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to