On 28-10-15, 17:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Well, the second statement above sort of contradicts the first one. :-) > > I guess the answer is "it is problematic, because I can't do the other > optimization then".
Hehe, right. > To that I'd really suggest trying to rework the code to use timer > functions directly in the first place. I will, but this problem will be present there as well. Because at that point of time, we will talk about per-cpu timers instead of delayed-works. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
