On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:49 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 17:22 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > > > > It'd be better if you could add a "tested-by:" instead. > > > > > > > > Patch works as expected: > > > > Tested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > > [] > > > > "I'm sure we can make the output even more similar by listing > > > > the MAINTAINERS tag after "reviewer" too." > > > > > > I guess we'll disagree on that one too. > > > > You just happened to think of it a few hours after I mentioned it. > > Nope, it seems a maintainers tag is what Krzysztof was suggesting > with his "supported reviewer" bit.
Which was in reply to the bit above. > I added the subsystem name. (subsystem name == MAINTAINERS tag) in my comment above. > An issue for that will be how multiple subsystem section matching > affects the output for reviewers who are also maintainers. I think that's okay, becuase the 'MAINTAINERS tag' will be different. As an example: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> (supporter:DRIVER SUBSYSTEM) Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> (reviewer:VENDOR DRIVER NAME) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
