Hi Stephen, [auto build test ERROR on block/for-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stephen-Rothwell/linux-next-manual-merge-of-the-akpm-current-tree-with-the-block-tree/20151101-235406 config: x86_64-randconfig-x019-201544 (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): block/blk-core.c: In function 'blk_queue_enter': >> block/blk-core.c:641:8: error: implicit declaration of function >> 'gfpflags_allow_blocking' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) ^ In file included from include/linux/linkage.h:4:0, from include/linux/kernel.h:6, from block/blk-core.c:14: block/blk-core.c: In function 'generic_make_request': >> block/blk-core.c:2041:33: error: '__GFP_RECLAIM' undeclared (first use in >> this function) if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) { ^ include/linux/compiler.h:165:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely' # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) ^ block/blk-core.c:2041:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in if (likely(blk_queue_enter(q, __GFP_RECLAIM) == 0)) { ^ include/linux/compiler.h:165:40: note: in definition of macro 'likely' # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/gfpflags_allow_blocking +641 block/blk-core.c 635 while (true) { 636 int ret; 637 638 if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter)) 639 return 0; 640 > 641 if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp)) 642 return -EBUSY; 643 644 ret = wait_event_interruptible(q->mq_freeze_wq, --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
