Hi, On Monday 04 December 2006 16:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> there's *always* a way to do such things more cleanly - such as the > patch below. Could you try to fix it up for 32-bit cycles_t platforms? I > bet the hackery will be limited to now() and maybe the conversion > routines, instead of spreading all around latency_trace.c. While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle type (however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
