* Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle
> type (however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem.
i havent changed the cycles_t type - it's still 32-bit. I agree with you
that we dont want to bloat 32-bit arch-level code by artificially
forcing everyone to a 64-bit cycles_t.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
