On 11/01/2015 05:00 PM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
On Oct 30, 2015, at 2:25 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Hi Akashi,
Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries
(return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output.
This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in
current->ret_stack[].
Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 2b43e20..b7d597c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
extern unsigned long ftrace_graph_call;
+extern void return_to_handler(void);
+
static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
{
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index bc0689a..631c49d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
@@ -78,6 +79,9 @@ struct stack_trace_data {
struct stack_trace *trace;
unsigned int no_sched_functions;
unsigned int skip;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+ unsigned int ret_stack_index;
+#endif
};
static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
@@ -86,6 +90,20 @@ static int save_trace(struct stackframe *frame, void *d)
struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace;
unsigned long addr = frame->pc;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+ if (addr == (unsigned long)return_to_handler - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE) {
+ /*
+ * This is a case where function graph tracer has
+ * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame
+ * to hook a function return.
+ * So replace it to an original value.
+ */
+ frame->pc = addr =
+ current->ret_stack[data->ret_stack_index--].ret
+ - AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
+
This hunk would be affected as the commit, "ARM64: unwind: Fix PC calculation",
e306dfd0, has been reverted.
Yeah, we don't need apply this patch any more.
The other patches in the series will not be affected.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
Best Regards
Jungseok Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
