> > /proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely to avoid breaking existing userspace > binaries that write to the tunable. > > Add a comment in the only possible location within the kernel tree to > describe the situation and motivation for keeping it around. > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]> > ---
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> > fs/proc/base.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -1032,6 +1032,16 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char > __user *buf, size_t count, > return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len); > } > > +/* > + * /proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely for backwards compatibility with previous > + * kernels. The effective policy is defined by oom_score_adj, which has a > + * different scale: oom_adj grew exponentially and oom_score_adj grows > linearly. > + * Values written to oom_adj are simply mapped linearly to oom_score_adj. > + * Processes that become oom disabled via oom_adj will still be oom disabled > + * with this implementation. > + * > + * oom_adj cannot be removed since existing userspace binaries use it. > + */ > static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > size_t count, loff_t *ppos) > { > -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
