When I test below piece of code with 12 processes(ie, 512M * 12 = 6G
consume) on my (3G ram + 12 cpu + 8G swap, the madvise_free is siginficat
slower (ie, 2x times) than madvise_dontneed.

loop = 5;
mmap(512M);
while (loop--) {
        memset(512M);
        madvise(MADV_FREE or MADV_DONTNEED);
}

The reason is lots of swapin.

1) dontneed: 1,612 swapin
2) madvfree: 879,585 swapin

If we find hinted pages were already swapped out when syscall is called,
it's pointless to keep the swapped-out pages in pte.
Instead, let's free the cold page because swapin is more expensive
than (alloc page + zeroing).

With this patch, it reduced swapin from 879,585 to 1,878 so elapsed time

1) dontneed: 6.10user 233.50system 0:50.44elapsed
2) madvfree: 6.03user 401.17system 1:30.67elapsed
2) madvfree + below patch: 6.70user 339.14system 1:04.45elapsed

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org>
---
 mm/madvise.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index a8813f7b37b3..6240a5de4a3a 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long 
addr,
        spinlock_t *ptl;
        pte_t *pte, ptent;
        struct page *page;
+       int nr_swap = 0;
 
        split_huge_page_pmd(vma, addr, pmd);
        if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
@@ -280,8 +281,24 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned 
long addr,
        for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
                ptent = *pte;
 
-               if (!pte_present(ptent))
+               if (pte_none(ptent))
                        continue;
+               /*
+                * If the pte has swp_entry, just clear page table to
+                * prevent swap-in which is more expensive rather than
+                * (page allocation + zeroing).
+                */
+               if (!pte_present(ptent)) {
+                       swp_entry_t entry;
+
+                       entry = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
+                       if (non_swap_entry(entry))
+                               continue;
+                       nr_swap--;
+                       free_swap_and_cache(entry);
+                       pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
+                       continue;
+               }
 
                page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
                if (!page)
@@ -317,6 +334,13 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned 
long addr,
                }
        }
 
+       if (nr_swap) {
+               if (current->mm == mm)
+                       sync_mm_rss(mm);
+
+               add_mm_counter(mm, MM_SWAPENTS, nr_swap);
+       }
+
        arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
        pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
        cond_resched();
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to