ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
This is what it was before.

>         if (acpi_irq_balance || !link->irq.active) {
>-               /*
>-                * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to promote
>-                * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
>-                */
>-               for (i = (link->irq.possible_count - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
>-                       if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >
>-                           acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.possible[i]])
>-                               irq = link->irq.possible[i];
I added a range check for link->irq.possible[i] and irq into this code.



This change:

-        * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to promote
-        * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
+        * Select the best IRQ.  This is done in reverse to
+        * promote the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.

is an unrelated whitespace change.  It doesn't belong in this patch.

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to