Hi Arnaldo,
On 2015/11/17 9:29, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[SNIP]
I've pushed everything to my perf/ebpf branch, please let me know if
what is there is acceptable, then it will be up to Ingo to decide where
to put this, if in perf/urgent for this merge window, or in perf/core,
for the next one.
I have checked and tested your changes in your perf/ebpf and they
are okay to me.
Ah, to extract the output for these BPF sub-tests I had to use -v, i.e.
just:
# perf test BPF
37: Test BPF filter : Ok
#
Ditto for the LLVM one.
Doesn't tell us too much about all those nice sub-tests...
How about:
# perf test -v BPF
37: Test BPF filter:
37.1: test a : Ok
37.2: test b : Ok
37.3: Test BPF prologue generation : Ok
37.4: Another... : Ok
37: Test BPF filter : Ok
#
I have sent a cset based on perf/ebpf in [1]. With the last 3 patch
you will see 'perf test' output information in this way. Please have a try:
# ./perf test LLVM BPF
35: Test LLVM searching and compiling :
35.1: Basic BPF llvm compiling test : Ok
35.2: Test kbuild searching : Ok
35.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation test : Ok
37: Test BPF filter :
37.1: Test basic BPF filtering : Ok
37.2: Test BPF prologue generation : Ok
Thank you.
[1]
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1447749170-175898-1-git-send-email-wangn...@huawei.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
