This patch addresses several related memory management issues in the probe
function:

1. for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each
iteration, so a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.

A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
@@

 for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
   ... when != of_node_put(child)
       when != e = child
(
   return child;
|
+  of_node_put(child);
?  return ...;
)
   ...
 }
// </smpl>

2. The devm_kzalloc'd data is not used if brcmnand_init_cs fails.  Free it
immediately, using devm_kfree in this case, instead of waiting for the
remove function.

3. If the continue is not taken, then host is added to a list, that has a
lifetime beyond the end of the for_each_available_child_of_node loop body.
Thus, of_node_get is needed on child, which is referenced by host.  A
corresponding of_node_put is needed in the remove function.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <[email protected]>

---

One could consider whether the of_node_get should be on host->of_node,
which looks more similar to the thing that is stored in the list.  I used
child, to be more similar to the of_node_put in the same function.

 drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c |   14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c 
b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
index 2a437c7..b0cb55d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
@@ -2237,16 +2237,20 @@ int brcmnand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct 
brcmnand_soc *soc)
                        struct brcmnand_host *host;
 
                        host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL);
-                       if (!host)
+                       if (!host) {
+                               of_node_put(child);
                                return -ENOMEM;
+                       }
                        host->pdev = pdev;
                        host->ctrl = ctrl;
                        host->of_node = child;
 
                        ret = brcmnand_init_cs(host);
-                       if (ret)
+                       if (ret) {
+                               devm_kfree(dev, host);
                                continue; /* Try all chip-selects */
-
+                       }
+                       of_node_get(child);
                        list_add_tail(&host->node, &ctrl->host_list);
                }
        }
@@ -2264,8 +2268,10 @@ int brcmnand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
        struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
        struct brcmnand_host *host;
 
-       list_for_each_entry(host, &ctrl->host_list, node)
+       list_for_each_entry(host, &ctrl->host_list, node) {
+               of_node_put(host->of_node);
                nand_release(&host->mtd);
+       }
 
        dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to