On Thursday 19 November 2015 14:21:16 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 00:16:54 Yury Norov wrote:
> >> +#define sys_lseek                      sys_llseek
> >
> > This seems pointless, as there is no sys_lseek
> 
> I think it should be the other way round.  Why would you want to use
> llseek if you can pass loff_t in a single register?

Right, it makes more sense the other way round.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to