> >  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static void select_assert(void *context)
> > +{
> > +   struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *edev = context;
> > +
> > +   gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpio_to_desc(edev->pdata->select_gpio), 1);
> 
> I would suggest to use gpio_set_value()

Could you explain why?

Maybe this gpio is on an SPI GPIO expander?


> >  static const struct of_device_id eeprom_93xx46_of_table[] = {
> >     { .compatible = "eeprom-93xx46", },
> >     { .compatible = "atmel,at93c46d", .data = &atmel_at93c46d_data, },
> > @@ -385,6 +402,15 @@ static int eeprom_93xx46_probe_dt(struct spi_device 
> > *spi)
> >     if (of_property_read_bool(np, "read-only"))
> >             pd->flags |= EE_READONLY;
> >  
> > +   ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "select-gpios", 0);
> 
> gpios or gpio? I see only one requested gpio.

DT always uses the plural. Go read some bindins in 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/

   Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to