On 16.11.2015 12:33, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> (
>    return child;
> |
> *  return ...;
> )
>    ...
>  }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>

Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com>

Thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c |   20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> index 77a2e05..f84a33a 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-berlin-sata.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>       struct phy_berlin_priv *priv;
>       struct resource *res;
> -     int i = 0;
> +     int ret, i = 0;
>       u32 phy_id;
>  
>       priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -237,22 +237,27 @@ static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>               if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &phy_id)) {
>                       dev_err(dev, "missing reg property in node %s\n",
>                               child->name);
> -                     return -EINVAL;
> +                     ret = -EINVAL;
> +                     goto put_child;
>               }
>  
>               if (phy_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(phy_berlin_power_down_bits)) {
>                       dev_err(dev, "invalid reg in node %s\n", child->name);
> -                     return -EINVAL;
> +                     ret = -EINVAL;
> +                     goto put_child;
>               }
>  
>               phy_desc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy_desc), GFP_KERNEL);
> -             if (!phy_desc)
> -                     return -ENOMEM;
> +             if (!phy_desc) {
> +                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                     goto put_child;
> +             }
>  
>               phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &phy_berlin_sata_ops);
>               if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
>                       dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY %d\n", phy_id);
> -                     return PTR_ERR(phy);
> +                     ret = PTR_ERR(phy);
> +                     goto put_child;
>               }
>  
>               phy_desc->phy = phy;
> @@ -269,6 +274,9 @@ static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       phy_provider =
>               devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, phy_berlin_sata_phy_xlate);
>       return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
> +put_child:
> +     of_node_put(child);
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id phy_berlin_sata_of_match[] = {
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to