On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday 22 November 2015 17:28:33 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Monday 16 November 2015 20:20:38 you wrote:
> > > > I'm now getting a build regressing with the attached randconfig 
> > > > configuration,
> > > > when compiling drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/common.o:
> > > > 
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `il_send_rxon_timing':
> > > > :(.text+0xbbac80): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > > > :(.text+0xbbac9c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > > > :(.text+0xbbacdc): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > > > :(.text+0xbbadc8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > > > :(.text+0xbbadf8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
> > > > :(.text+0xbbae3c): more undefined references to `__aeabi_uldivmod' 
> > > > follow
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `il_send_rxon_timing':
> > > > :(.text+0xbbb11c): undefined reference to `____ilog2_NaN'
> > > 
> 
> I'm able to reproduce it, and I am in the process of reintroducing the 
> last patch piece by piece to see what breaks.  The presence of 
> ____ilog2_NaN is particularly intriguing as this would mean 0 is passed 
> to ilog2() somewhere.

OK... I'm able to "fix" the build with:

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/div64.h b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
index 163f77999e..d246c4c801 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/div64.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/div64.h
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend, uint32_t 
divisor);
        uint32_t __rem;                                 \
        (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0));  \
        if (__builtin_constant_p(__base) &&             \
-           is_power_of_2(__base)) {                    \
+           is_power_of_2(__base) && __base != 0) {     \
                __rem = (n) & (__base - 1);             \
                (n) >>= ilog2(__base);                  \
        } else if (__div64_const32_is_OK &&             \

What doesn't make sense to me is the fact that is_power_of_2() is 
defined as:

static inline __attribute__((const))
bool is_power_of_2(unsigned long n)
{
        return (n != 0 && ((n & (n - 1)) == 0));
}

So the test for zero is already in there.

And adding BUILD_BUG_ON(__builtin_constant_p(__base) && __base == 0) 
before the if doesn't trig either.

Confused.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to