On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:49 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:32:32PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > 
> > Move PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task checks to cpuset cgroups,  
> > where they belong. This makes it possible to attach PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 
> > tasks to Intel CAT cgroup.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitul...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > v2: "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY check" -> "PF_NO_SETAFFINITY and kthreadd_task
> > checks"
> 
> This wasn't just for cpuset.  It's for all controllers.

Hm, indeed.  Workers landing in a throttled cfs rq wouldn't be as
painful as an rt worker being born in an rq with no rt_runtime, but
could sting.  Workers stuffed into the freezer would sting mightily.

        -Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to