On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:47:29PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 79a29d564bff..143c933f0b81 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4895,6 +4895,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> switch (get_mctgt_type(vma, addr, ptent, &target)) {
> case MC_TARGET_PAGE:
> page = target.page;
> + /*
> + * We can have a part of the split pmd here. Moving it
> + * can be done but it would be too convoluted so simply
> + * ignore such a partial THP and keep it in original
> + * memcg. There should be somebody mapping the head.
> + */
> + if (PageCompound(page))
> + goto put;
> if (isolate_lru_page(page))
> goto put;
> if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(page, false,
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
The charge moving concept is fundamentally flawed and its
implementation here is incomplete and races with reclaim.
Really, nobody should be using this. Absent any actual regression
reports, a minimal fix to stop this code from generating warnings
should be enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
