On 2015-12-09 03:33, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Intel RAPL initialized on several systems where the BIOS lock bit (msr
> 0x610, bit 63) was set.  This occured because the return value of
> rapl_read_data_raw() was being checked, rather than the value of the variable
> passed in, locked.
> 
> This patch properly implments the rapl_read_data_raw() call to check the
> variable locked, and now the Intel RAPL driver outputs the warning:
> 
>       intel_rapl: RAPL package 0 domain package locked by BIOS
> 
> and does not initialize for the package.
> 
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Radivoje Jovanovic <radivoje.jovano...@intel.com>
> Cc: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Mathias Krause <mini...@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanic...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c |    6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> index cc97f08..0b0d09d 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> @@ -1341,11 +1341,13 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct rapl_package 
> *rp, int cpu)
>  
>       for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains; rd++) {
>               /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS */
> -             if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked)) {
> +             ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +             if (locked)
>                       pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by BIOS\n",
>                               rp->id, rd->name);
>                               rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
> -             }
>       }

A good spot!
But this patch looks setting DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED bit to all package 
domains.
I suppose what you are going to do is like below.

--- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c     2015-11-02 09:05:25.000000000 +0900
+++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c     2015-12-09 09:05:33.386142840 +0900
@@ -1340,10 +1340,13 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct ra
 
        for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains; rd++) {
                /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS */
-               if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked)) {
+               ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+               if (locked) {
                        pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by BIOS\n",
                                rp->id, rd->name);
-                               rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
+                       rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
                }
        }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to