On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> Why not add a new file flag instead ?
>
> Something like this (editing your patch by hand to illustrate) :
>
> diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
> index ad17e05ebf95..3a7eee76ea90 100644
> --- a/fs/file_table.c
> +++ b/fs/file_table.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,17 @@ static void __fput(struct file *file)
>
> might_sleep();
>
> + /*
> + * XXX: While avoiding mmap_sem, we've already been written to.
> + * We must ignore the return value, since we can't reject the
> + * write.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(file->f_flags & FL_DROP_PRIVS)) {
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + file_remove_privs(file);
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + }
> +
> fsnotify_close(file);
> /*
> * The function eventpoll_release() should be the first called
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 3aa514254161..409bd7047e7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -913,3 +913,4 @@
> #define FL_OFDLCK 1024 /* lock is "owned" by struct file */
> #define FL_LAYOUT 2048 /* outstanding pNFS layout */
> +#define FL_DROP_PRIVS 4096 /* lest something weird decides that 2 is OK
> */
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index c387430f06c3..08a77e0cf65f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2036,6 +2036,7 @@ static inline int wp_page_reuse(struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> if (!page_mkwrite)
> file_update_time(vma->vm_file);
> + vma->vm_file->f_flags |= FL_DROP_PRIVS;
> }
>
> return VM_FAULT_WRITE;
>
> Willy
>
Is f_flags safe to write like this without holding a lock?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
