On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:47:18AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> In open, sure, but what about under mm/memory.c where we're trying to >> twiddle it from vma->file->f_flags as in my patch? That seemed like it >> would want atomic safety. > > Sigh... Again, I'm not at all convinced that this is the right approach,
I'm open to any suggestions. Every path I've tried has been ultimately blocked by mmap_sem. :( > but generally you need ->f_lock. And in situations where the bit can > go only off->on, check it lockless, skip the whole thing entirely if it's > already set and grab the spinlock otherwise. And I can take f_lock safely under mmap_sem? -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
