On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:

SNIP

> 
> I was wrong about there being any problem using evsel->threads.  While the
> patch "perf evlist: Factor perf_evlist__(enable|disable) function" changes
> the number of threads (from perf_evlist__nr_threads() to thread_map__nr()),
> the system_wide check is still done in perf_evsel__run_ioctl(), so
> everything is fine.
> 
> WRT "[RFC 7/7] perf tools: Remove perf_evlist__(enable|disable)_event
> functions" it might be worth putting the evsel->fd checks that
> perf_evlist__[enable|disable]_event() have into 
> perf_evsel__[enable|disable]().
> But otherwise it looks fine.
> 
> The gap in testing that I was thinking of is below:
> 
> From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:05:11 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Make perf_evlist__open() open evsels with their
>  cpus and threads (like perf record does)
> 
> 'perf record' uses perf_evsel__open() to open events and passes the 
> evsel->cpus
> and evsel->threads.  Many tests and some tools instead use perf_evlist__open()
> which passes instead evlist->cpus and evlist->threads.
> 
> Make perf_evlist__open() follow the 'perf record' behaviour so that a 
> consistent
> approach is taken.

coo,  I'll queue this one for Arnaldo to pick up together with:
  [RFC 7/7] perf tools: Remove perf_evlist__(enable|disable)_event

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index d1b6c206bb93..306dacb33d8e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ int perf_evlist__open(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>       perf_evlist__update_id_pos(evlist);
>  
>       evlist__for_each(evlist, evsel) {
> -             err = perf_evsel__open(evsel, evlist->cpus, evlist->threads);
> +             err = perf_evsel__open(evsel, evsel->cpus, evsel->threads);
>               if (err < 0)
>                       goto out_err;
>       }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to