On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Ani Sinha wrote: >> Commit 984d74a72076a1 ("sysrq: rcu-ify __handle_sysrq") >> replaced spin_lock_irqsave() calls with >> rcu_read_lock() calls in sysrq. Since rcu_read_lock() does not >> disable preemption, faulthandler_disabled() in >> __do_page_fault() in x86/fault.c returns false. When the code >> later calls might_sleep() in the pagefault handler, we get the >> following warning: >> >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at >> ../arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1187 >> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 4706, name: bash >> Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff81484339>] printk+0x48/0x4a >> >> To fix this, we release the RCU read lock before we crash. >> >> Tested this patch on linux 3.18 by booting off one of our boards. >> >> Fixes: 984d74a72076a1 ("sysrq: rcu-ify __handle_sysrq") >> >> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <a...@arista.com> > > I queued this with Rik's Signed-off-by, and fixed some checkpatch.pl > errors. Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches in the future. > > Please see below for the result.
Yes, sorry. I forgot to run the script before sending Thanks for fixing my comment and the trailing whitespace. > > Rik, did you test this as well? If so, may I also have your Tested-by? > > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > commit c95a158356397844a5a6deb0bd58758084f891df > Author: Ani Sinha <a...@arista.com> > Date: Thu Dec 17 17:15:10 2015 -0800 > > sysrq: Fix warning in sysrq generated crash. > > Commit 984d74a72076a1 ("sysrq: rcu-ify __handle_sysrq") replaced > spin_lock_irqsave() calls with rcu_read_lock() calls in sysrq. Since > rcu_read_lock() does not disable preemption, faulthandler_disabled() in > __do_page_fault() in x86/fault.c returns false. When the code later calls > might_sleep() in the pagefault handler, we get the following warning: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at > ../arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1187 > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 4706, name: bash > Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff81484339>] printk+0x48/0x4a > > To fix this, we release the RCU read lock before we crash. > > Tested this patch on linux 3.18 by booting off one of our boards. > > Fixes: 984d74a72076a1 ("sysrq: rcu-ify __handle_sysrq") > > Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <a...@arista.com> > Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > index 5381a728d23e..e5139402e7f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c > @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ static void sysrq_handle_crash(int key) > { > char *killer = NULL; > > + /* we need to release the RCU read lock here, > + * otherwise we get an annoying > + * 'BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context' > + * complaint from the kernel before the panic. > + */ > + rcu_read_unlock(); > panic_on_oops = 1; /* force panic */ > wmb(); > *killer = 1; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/