On 18-12-15, 20:07, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:43:27 +0100
> 
> The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function
> while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function.
> Let us make this usage consistent.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BF60x
> -unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
> +int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
>  {
>       struct clk *clk;

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to