On 12/19/15, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 19:13 -0700, Jeff Merkey wrote: > >> @@ -519,6 +528,18 @@ static int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args >> *args) >> (dr6 & (~DR_TRAP_BITS))) >> rc = NOTIFY_DONE; >> >> + /* >> + * if we are about to signal to >> + * do_debug() to stop further processing >> + * and we have not ascertained the source >> + * of the breakpoint, log it as spurious. >> + */ > > Ahem... > > >
It matches the comments in the other section os code. So what is wrong with this. The rest of the file uses the exact same comment style. Please help me with this. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
