> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> >>> +static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
> >>> +{
> >>> + switch (state) {
> >>> + case MEI_WDT_IDLE: return "IDLE";
> >>> + case MEI_WDT_START: return "START";
> >>> + case MEI_WDT_RUNNING: return "RUNNING";
> >>> + case MEI_WDT_STOPPING: return "STOPPING";
> >>> + default: return "unknown";
> >>
> >> Doesn't this cause checkpatch warnings ?
> > It doesn't and also checkpatch.pl is just a help tool.
>
> I should have said "Doesn't this violate the single-statement-per-line"
> coding style rule, but I guess then you'd argue that "case xxx:" is not
> a statement.
I believe it is reasonably readable , but I don't have a strong feeling about
it, if you do I can change it.
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
