On error we are supposed to return negative error code but here we
missed giving the nagative sign. It was never a problem because the
pointer returned from scif_add_mmu_notifier() was never tested. But even
though we should be returning negative error.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <su...@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_dma.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_dma.c b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_dma.c
index 95a13c6..f998daa 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_dma.c
@@ -293,13 +293,13 @@ scif_add_mmu_notifier(struct mm_struct *mm, struct 
scif_endpt *ep)
                 = kzalloc(sizeof(*mmn), GFP_KERNEL);
 
        if (!mmn)
-               return ERR_PTR(ENOMEM);
+               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
        scif_init_mmu_notifier(mmn, current->mm, ep);
        if (mmu_notifier_register(&mmn->ep_mmu_notifier,
                                  current->mm)) {
                kfree(mmn);
-               return ERR_PTR(EBUSY);
+               return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
        }
        list_add(&mmn->list, &ep->rma_info.mmn_list);
        return mmn;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to