On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:58:55AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote: > > Because the first patch modifies the struct public_key and removes the MPIs > from it, > which the code modified in the second patch still uses. If bisect only takes > the first > then the build will fail on the security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c as > reported by > kbuild test robot:
Why not just leave the MPIs in the structure and only remove them by adding a third patch? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
