On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is there any aspect of the passed-through printf_spec which isn't > overridden in xnumber? The users are/will be various %p extensions, > which probably means that no-one passes a non-default precision (gcc > complains about %.*p), and the remaining possible flags (PLUS, LEFT, > SPACE) are useless and/or impossible to pass to %p Actually, LEFT can be passed to %p (or get set by passing a negative field width via %*p), which would be actively harmful: When LEFT is set, number() explicitly removes the ZEROPAD flag, so we'd get "0xabcdef " instead of "0x00abcdef". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
