>> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
>> @@ -5638,9 +5638,10 @@ static int qeth_core_set_online(struct
>> ccwgroup_device *gdev)
>> {
>> struct qeth_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(&gdev->dev);
>> int rc;
>> - int def_discipline;
>>
>> if (!card->discipline) {
>> + int def_discipline;
>> +
>> if (card->info.type == QETH_CARD_TYPE_IQD)
>> def_discipline = QETH_DISCIPLINE_LAYER3;
>
> Same here: I don't think we want to start with patches like this.
Thanks for your feedback.
> This going to be a never ending story without much benefit.
Is the source code a bit clearer and safer if it will be expressed
directly that the use of a specific variable is not intended for
a complete function implementation but for the smaller scope
of an if branch?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
