On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:04:08PM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> altr_edac.c originally added support for SDRAM. Now we're adding support
> for L2 and OCRAM into the same file by using #ifdef
> CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_OCRAM and CONFIG_EDAC_ALTERA_L2C. So "clean" was to
> move the l2 and ocram implementation into separate files.

So what's wrong with adding those to the same file and using different
registration functions? Like xgene_edac does, for example.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to