On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > From: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> > > Well, this one doesn't work properly before alternatives have run. And > it was supposed to provide an optimized JMP because the assumption was > that the offset it is jumping to is within a signed byte and thus a > two-byte JMP. >
Looks good except for the subject line -- you didn't actually remove static_cpu_has :) --Andy
