On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:41:49AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant
Even better,
thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/alternatives: Add an auxilary sec... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/alternatives: Add an auxilary... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/alternatives: Add an auxi... H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE_* Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEATURE... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86/cpufeature: Carve out X86_FEA... Borislav Petkov
- [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu_has() Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu_has... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove st... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/cpufeature: Remove static_cpu_has... H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH 5/5] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic check after ... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/alternatives: Discard dynamic che... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86/cpufeature: Cleanups and improveme... Brian Gerst
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86/cpufeature: Cleanups and impr... Borislav Petkov
