On 01/21/16 12:08, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/21/2016 02:33 AM, Leonid Shatz wrote:
>> In view of above findings we would like to suggest to double check if
>> disabling AVX together with "eagerfpu off" is actually required and is a
>> real necessity. It would be helpful to consult with Intel engineers
>> regarding related design details.
>
> Hi Leonid,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> Are you aware of any actual eagerfpu=off use in practice, or is this
> mostly a theoretical concern?
>
Looking into this, FWIW.
-hpa
