On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:08:18PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 01/21/16 13:03, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: >> > Hello Leonid, >> > >> > You are probably right. Let me check this and get back to you. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Yu-cheng >> > >> >> The hardware people have gotten back to us and this inconsistency in >> the SDM is unintentional (other places in the SDM has it correctly.) >> So we should revert this patch. >> >> -hpa >> >Agree. Thanks Peter and Leonid!
Thank you all for your feedback and clarifications. That's was my assumption that SDM was somewhat misleading, but I was not %100 sure about it. It could be nice, though to see future releases of SDM taking this issue in account. Leonid
