On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:09:31 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:04:51 -0500
> Jessica Yu <j...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > >diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > >index 8358f46..aeabd81 100644
> > >--- a/kernel/module.c
> > >+++ b/kernel/module.c
> > >@@ -3371,6 +3371,13 @@ static int complete_formation(struct module *mod, 
> > >struct load_info *info)
> > >   mod->state = MODULE_STATE_COMING;
> > >   mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> > >
> > >+  ftrace_module_enable(mod);
> > >+  err = klp_module_enable(mod);
> > >+  if (err) {
> > >+          ftrace_release_mod(mod);
> > >+          return err;
> > >+  }    
> > 
> > If we go this route, should we should print a big warning ("Livepatch
> > couldn't patch loading module X") instead of aborting the module load
> > completely?   
> 
> If anything, that should be done in klp_module_enable() not in the
> module code.

And I take that back. The module wont load. The user will notice that
before any console warning. Thus no warning needed.

-- Steve

Reply via email to