On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 07:37:51PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarod Wilson <ja...@redhat.com> > Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:49:44 -0500 > > > The network core tries to keep track of dropped packets, but some packets > > you wouldn't really call dropped, so much as intentionally ignored, under > > certain circumstances. One such case is that of bonding and team device > > slaves that are currently inactive. Their respective rx_handler functions > > return RX_HANDLER_EXACT (the only places in the kernel that return that), > > which ends up tracking into the network core's __netif_receive_skb_core() > > function's drop path, with no pt_prev set. On a noisy network, this can > > result in a very rapidly incrementing rx_dropped counter, not only on the > > inactive slave(s), but also on the master device, such as the following: > ... > > Both my inbox and patchwork only show patch 2, 3, and 4. Where is #1?
Crap. It seems I fat-fingered net...@vger.kernel.org without the v in front of ger. Will re-send in a sec, hopefully finallly not screwing it up this time. -- Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com
