On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Alexander Kuleshov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The check and definitions related to ramdisk are similar in the >> early_reserve_initrd() and reserve_initrd(). So we can get rid of >> early_reserve_initrd() and and use late or early algorithm for >> initrd reservation depends on reserve_initrd() parameter value. > > Perhaps: "Squash {early_,}reserve_initrd() to one function" would be > better for Subject line since it describes what you are doing here > (Answering question "What kind of refactor?"). > > Also if you have more argument (like .text size before and after) I > suppose it would have been passed faster. >
Hello Andy, thanks for your suggestions. Will update it in second revision.
