> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 9:34 PM > To: Lijun Pan <lijun....@freescale.com> > Cc: a...@arndb.de; de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; bhamc...@freescale.com; lijun.pan2...@gmail.com; > bhupesh.sha...@freescale.com; german.riv...@freescale.com; > ag...@suse.de; stuart.yo...@freescale.com; nir.e...@freescale.com; > itai.k...@freescale.com; scottw...@freescale.com; le...@freescale.com; > r89...@freescale.com; dan.carpen...@oracle.com; > richard.schm...@freescale.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to > differentiate root dprc > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote: > > Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether a > > device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type. > > Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler and > > easier to understand. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <lijun....@freescale.com> > > --- > > v2: use static inline function instead of macro > > replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc > > > This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big patcheset for > this subsystem being applied. Can you please rebase it against my staging- > testing branch of staging.git and resend? >
Greg, I have just rebased the patches and re-sended the v3. Please check your emails. Thanks Lijun > thanks, > > greg k-h