On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:18:59PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> They return the length of kn->parent or kn->name and should be aligned with
> kernfs_path_len which also returns size_t.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brau...@mailbox.org>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/dir.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> index 742bf4a..a3553b8 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static bool kernfs_lockdep(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static int kernfs_name_locked(struct kernfs_node *kn, char *buf, size_t
> buflen)
> +static size_t kernfs_name_locked(struct kernfs_node *kn, char *buf, size_t
> buflen)
> {
> return strlcpy(buf, kn->parent ? kn->name : "/", buflen);
> }
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static char * __must_check kernfs_path_locked(struct
> kernfs_node *kn, char *buf,
> *
> * This function can be called from any context.
> */
> -int kernfs_name(struct kernfs_node *kn, char *buf, size_t buflen)
> +size_t kernfs_name(struct kernfs_node *kn, char *buf, size_t buflen)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
Now if only you had test built this patch :(
Please be more careful, it just makes maintainers grumpy and annoyed
when you do that...
