On 11-02-16, 02:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > And one question tangentially related to this patch: Would it be > possible to avoid calling __cpufreq_governor(_EXIT) for CPU offline? > > The fact that we still carry out the whole governor teardown at that > point is slightly disturbing, as in theory it should be possible to > keep the governor attributes in place across offline/online.
Will think about that after the current code is stable a bit. It should be possible, but need to see if it is worth it. -- viresh
