On 17 February 2016 at 23:11, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:02:56PM +0100, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On 17 February 2016 at 21:07, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
>> > Add a regmap for accessing the EEPROM, and then use that with the
>> > NVMEM framework. Enable backward compatibility in the MVMEM config
>>
>> typo: MVMEM
>
> Thanks
>
>> > +/*
>> > + * Provide a regmap interface, which is registered with the NVMEM
>> > + * framework
>> > +*/
>> > +static int eeprom_93xx46_regmap_read(void *context, const void *reg,
>> > + size_t reg_size, void *val,
>> > + size_t val_size)
>> > +{
>> > + struct eeprom_93xx46_dev *eeprom_93xx46 = context;
>> > + off_t offset = *(u32 *)reg;
>> > + int err;
>> > +
>> > + err = eeprom_93xx46_read(eeprom_93xx46, val, offset, val_size);
>> > + if (err)
>> > + return err;
>> > + return 0;
>>
>> Can be:
>> return eeprom_93xx46_read(eeprom_93xx46, val, offset, val_size);
>>
>> Allows you to remove the 'err' variable also.
>
> Nope. regmap wants a return value of 0 or error. eeprom_93xx46_read()
> returns how many bytes where actually read. So we either need this
> code here, or we change the return from eeprom_93xx46_read().
ah, my bad. Sorry about that.
regards,
Joachim Eastwood
