On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:28:22 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would something like this make sense instead? It works perfectly. Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Thanks! -- Steve > > It also retains the ->runtime while yielded, and would actually 'fix' a > case where, when we call yield, we would have had a negative runtime > after update_curr_dl(). > > The current code will 'gift' us extra runtime in that case. > > ---
