On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Michael Turquette <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2016-02-25 17:16:17) >> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 04:50:29 PM Michael Turquette wrote: >> > Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2016-02-22 17:31:09) >> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Steve Muckle <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > For example, in the acpi-cpufreq case all depends on what's there in >> > > the ACPI tables. >> > >> > It's all a moot point until the locking in cpufreq is changed. >> >> No, it isn't. Look at this, for example: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8426741/ > > Thanks for the pointer. Do you mind Cc'ing me on future versions?
I'll do that. Thanks, Rafael
