On 03-03-16, 20:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > So this is a totally bicycle shed discussion argument which makes it > seriously irritating. > > Does it really matter so much how this structure is called? > Essentially, it is something to build your tunables structure around > and you can treat it as a counterpart of a C++ abstract class. So the > name *does* make sense in that context.
:( I thought you will apply this patch to linux-next *now*, as it was quite independent and so gave such comment. > That said, what about gov_attr_set? Maybe just gov_kobj or whatever you wish. -- viresh
