DMA mask will already be set by sdhci_set_dma_mask(), which
is equivalent to the removed code since pci_set_dma_mask()
expands to its DMA-API counterpart.
There should also be no reason to set the DMA mask after probe.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
index df3b8eced8c4..62aa5d0efcee 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
@@ -1302,7 +1302,6 @@ static int sdhci_pci_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot;
struct pci_dev *pdev;
- int ret = -1;
slot = sdhci_priv(host);
pdev = slot->chip->pdev;
@@ -1314,20 +1313,6 @@ static int sdhci_pci_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
"doesn't fully claim to support it.\n");
}
- if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) {
- if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA) {
- host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
- } else {
- ret = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- if (ret)
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set 64-bit DMA
mask\n");
- }
- }
- if (ret)
- ret = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
pci_set_master(pdev);
return 0;
--
2.7.2
