On 03/08/2016 02:42 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> > > compaction code is doing weird dances between > COMPACT_FOO -> int -> unsigned long > > but there doesn't seem to be any reason for that. All functions which
I vaguely recall trying this once and running into header dependency hell. But maybe it was something a bit different and involved storing a value in struct compact_control. > return/use one of those constants are not expecting any other value > so it really makes sense to define an enum for them and make it clear > that no other values are expected. > > This is a pure cleanup and shouldn't introduce any functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Thanks.
