uncharge_list() does an unusual list walk because the function can
take regular lists with dedicated list_heads as well as singleton
lists where a single page is passed via the page->lru list node.

This can sometimes lead to confusion as well as suggestions to replace
the loop with a list_for_each_entry(), which wouldn't work.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8614e0d750e5..fa7bf354ae32 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5420,6 +5420,10 @@ static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
        struct list_head *next;
        struct page *page;
 
+       /*
+        * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
+        * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
+        */
        next = page_list->next;
        do {
                unsigned int nr_pages = 1;
-- 
2.7.2

Reply via email to